Tuesday, December 30, 2008

India has drama in store

India has drama in store

By Amy Yee

Published: December 29 2008 22:06 | Last updated: December 29 2008 22:06

When Kishore Biyani tried a “clean Italian look” of glass and minimalist lines in one of his Big Bazaar stores, he was surprised by the effect on his customers – it drove them away. The sleek section of the store remained empty while the rest of the shop bustled.

Mr Biyani, head of the Future Group, India’s largest retailer, realised the decor was intimidating and alienating the middle-class Indian consumers who were more used to crowded bazaars and shops.

“You need hustle and bustle,” says Mr Biyani. “The Indian model of shopping is theatrical. There is buzz and haggling. If you have wide aisles you have a problem.”

Why crowded neighbourhood shops still enjoy the upper hand

Big, modern stores are not guaranteed victory in India’s retail revolution. Tiny, crowded hole-in-the-wall neighbourhood shops do have advantages over their “organised retail” counterparts. Small shopkeepers often know their customer personally, offer free home delivery, let customers order by phone and keep a tab.

“I had a grocer in Mumbai. I never saw him but the service was fabulous,” says Anirudha Mukhedkar, chief executive of Restore Solutions, a retail consultancy in Bangalore. “I ordered over the phone and I would pay him at the end of the month. He didn’t have to have a large store.”

Indian customers traditionally favour personal service and “not a cold-blooded transaction”. Retailers in India should think about “how to personalise and bring a degree of warmth to the transaction”, says Mr Mukhedkar. “If retail wants to get its act right, it needs to go back to basics.”

Kishore Biyani, chief executive of Future Group, India’s largest retailer, also retains some of the basics of shopping in India. Mr Biyani is known for creating the atmosphere of an open-air bazaar in his sprawling hypermarkets. His Big Bazaar stores have narrow aisles, overflowing bins and loud music.

“In India, theatre is always there in selling,” says Mr Biyani.

Mr Biyani’s Big Bazaar “hypermarket” stores, which are India’s closest equivalent to Wal-Mart, are clean, air-conditioned and well lit. But they have deliberately narrow aisles and overflowing display bins that simulate the feel of open-air markets common in India.

Drama and theatre are important elements in Mr Biyani’s stores, which also include the Pantaloons and Food Bazaar chains. At one store in a Mumbai shopping mall, dance music popular in Indian nightclubs blasts from loudspeakers while customers jostle to reach the best goods.

Modern retail stores are relatively new to India, so Mr Biyani and other retailers are having to adapt to the evolving shopping habits of Indians. The biggest mistake that retailers make is thinking that “just because you have set something up people will come”, says Anirudha Mukhedkar, chief executive of Restore Solutions, a retail consultancy in Bangalore.

Shopping in so-called organised stores accounts for only 4 per cent of India’s $322bn (€229bn, £218bn) retail industry but this share is expected to grow to 22 per cent of $427bn by 2010, according to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

Unlike their struggling counterparts in the west, India’s retailers are looking at an attractive growth market. But getting it right will be tricky, given the country’s diverse population and distinct regional cultures.

Understanding India’s wide diversity – socio-economic, religious, regional and linguistic – is key to that strategy. “When you say Indian consumers, there are at least 10 Indias,” says Mr Mukhedkar.

Cultural preferences vary widely between regions. For example, types of rice and how people buy it differs in the north and south, says Harminder Sahni, managing director of Technopak, a retail consultancy based in Delhi.

In the north, rice might be sold in open sacks so consumers can inspect the goods. But in some parts of the south, rice is a common staple sold in sealed packets.

Store lay-outs will also vary according to region. In big groceries in Kolkata, eastern India, and other coastal cities, fish is a staple sold in the vegetable section, whereas it is categorised with meat in inland areas.

Because of these distinct regional tastes, retailers “don’t look at India as India”, says Mr Sahni. “They pick a region or market or city...The first two years might be in one city.” He says that most do not have ambitions to open pan-Indian stores: “Many start in one part of India and just stick to that.”

The Future Group has found another way of capitalising on regional variations: it has 72 annual promotions linked to local festivals. The company says the Big Bazaar store in Bhubaneswar, capital of the backwater eastern state of Orissa, took the group record for a single day’s turnover after promoting a sale linked to a festival.

William Bissell, managing director of Fabindia, a chain of upscale boutiques that sells clothing and housewares, says “every store has to offer a different mix. That’s why retailing in India is so complicated”.

Mr Bissell notes that Fabindia, founded in 1960, has an inventory of 200,000 items to cater to consumer tastes that vary dramatically across regions. “Any retailer will say that is crazy,” says Mr Bissell. To manage its enormous inventory, Fabindia has installed an IT system to track the flow of goods at nearly 100 stores in India.

Capacious western-style malls are also cropping up, especially for luxury goods. But when catering to the mass consumer, “it makes sense to have smaller stores with more workers”, says Mr Mukhedkar of Restore Solutions.

He points out that India’s cities command some of the highest real estate prices in the world but labour costs are among the lowest. Packed shelves are also preferable to give the consumer a sense of abundance and choice. “If a shelf can take 50 things, try to fit in 75,” Mr Mukhedkar advises. “Density per square foot has to be as high as possible.”

For practical reasons, Mr Bissell favours smaller stores. He dismisses the notion of a 100,000 sq ft Ikea-style store in India, except where “enormous” volumes might justify high maintenance costs. “At 40 to 44 degrees in the summer I’m going to have to air-condition the whole thing. That would be an environmental disaster.” And it would be too expensive, he adds, in a country where electricity rates are high, and power cuts force many businesses to buy costly diesel-run generators.

The biggest misunderstanding about retail in India, says Mr Bissell, is that Indians consume as copiously as westerners. Instead, Indians are more selective, value-conscious and price-sensitive. Mr Sahni of Technopak agrees. In a grocery store, an Indian consumer will not fill up a trolley as is common practice in the west. “Indians will shop with a basket. Below a certain income level, people won’t want to spend so much with each transaction.” Smaller refrigerators and limited storage space at home are also factors. “People will buy more frequently and in smaller packets,” says Mr Sahni.

But some aspects of retail in India are more abstract. To stay attuned to India’s pulse, Mr Biyani has a special unit devoted to tracking the country’s social trends to incubate ideas for new store brands and strategies.

The “Future Ideas” group includes sociologists, interior designers, graphic designers and other cultural experts. One of their biggest tasks is analysing the changing tastes of Indian youth.

With more than half of India’s population under the age of 25, understanding their consuming habits and aspirations is a priority for the Future Group. “India is still family-centred, and young people influence purchases,” says Mr Biyani. But by far his biggest challenge as a retailer is managing the speed of change in India.

“How do you make an organisation that is not permanent in thought, structure or design?” asks Mr Biyani. “Retail in the next five years will be different. Nothing is permanent.”

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Sony Chases Apple's Magic

Even with a former Steve Jobs lieutenant driving innovation, Sony still hasn't captured its rival's cool

Sony Chief Executive Howard Stringer bristles every time he gets the question: Why can't the Japanese electronics giant be more like Apple? The maker of the iPod, iPhone, and Mac computers consistently delivers supercool gadgets that are easy to use, while Sony sells music players, TVs, and cameras that get mixed reviews and often don't even work well with other Sony (SNE) products. "Sony is a very big company," Stringer says by way of explanation. "Our toughest competitors are niche organizations."

Stringer is quick to admit, though, that Sony may face a troubled future if it can't rival Apple (AAPL) in creating simple software that makes its gadgets fun and in giving consumers easy access to music and videos. Apple's iTunes store has long made filling iPods a cinch, but Sony's consumer electronics and PlayStation divisions have only recently started to integrate their offerings with those of the company's movie studio and music label. That's one likely reason why Sony's products earn profit margins of 10% or so, compared with the 30% margins that Apple's devices command.

So Stringer went straight to the source. Three years ago, he hired Tim Schaaff, a top lieutenant of Apple CEO Steve Jobs, and created the title of senior vice-president for software development for him. Although Schaaff was expected to spend most of his time in California, he's so integral to Stringer's plan to remake Sony that he has a direct reporting line to the CEO. Schaaff's role has grown quickly, and today he also has a hand in product design, licensing, planning, and engineering. "When we brought Tim on board, it was a recognition that we needed someone whose experience crosses multiple borders," Stringer says.

A KNACK FOR KILLER PRODUCTS

Schaaff doesn't come across as an agent of change. The 48-year-old Dartmouth grad studiously avoids the press. When he speaks, he does so slowly and deliberately, giving the impression that he is reading from index cards inside his head. But at Apple, Schaaff showed a knack for translating geeky ideas into killer products. The self-taught software engineer oversaw development of Apple's QuickTime video-streaming format, which serves as the foundation of iTunes, the iPod, and the iPhone.

Stringer is clearly hoping Schaaff can seed Sony with Apple's Silicon Valley entrepreneurial culture. When the Welsh-born Stringer became Sony's first non-Japanese CEO in early 2005, he pledged to make the company "cool again." While Schaaff has made important strides toward that goal, Sony clearly needs to inject some zing into its products. On Oct. 29 the company said net earnings for the quarter ended Sept. 30 were off by 72% from the year-earlier period. The report came on the heels of a warning that profits for the year would fall by more than half, due to the strengthening yen and lackluster sales of TVs and digital cameras.

It was more evidence that after a three-year makeover, Sony is still struggling to get its groove back. Now, as consumers rein in spending, they're even less likely to buy the expensive gizmos Sony plans to unveil over the coming months. That would be a major setback for "Sony United," Stringer's program to turn the company's fractured family of products and services into a model of integration. The goal is to sell Bravia televisions that connect to the Web and download the latest Spider-Man movie, Walkman phones that offer tunes from Sony artists such as Beyoncé, and e-book devices that ask if you want to purchase that new John Grisham thriller.

Stringer has given Schaaff unprecedented freedom to conquer resistance and boost cooperation among Sony's myriad—and often warring—units. Schaaff has also served as something akin to secretary of state, working with other companies to help make Sony products more appealing. Last summer, for instance, he led a high-stakes effort to persuade Hollywood to allow downloads of films and TV shows via Sony's PlayStation 3 game console. Sony wanted to introduce the service at the annual E3 video game convention in Los Angeles in July to highlight the versatility of the PS3, which includes a Blu-ray disk player and a hard drive that can store hundreds of movies. With just six months to rally the studios, Schaaff's days became a blur of airplane lounges and conference rooms as he shuttled from Hollywood to Sony offices in California and Tokyo. But the studios held off, waiting to see whether rivals would sign up. "Nobody wants to be the only guy licensing content," Schaaff says.

"THE DOORS ARE MORE OPEN"

Finally, as workers were installing giant flat-panel televisions at Los Angeles' Shrine Auditorium for Sony's news conference, Schaaff's team started to make some real headway. Promising to include technology that would prevent users from sharing films over the Internet, Schaaff managed to convince studio executives that the PS3 network could provide a new outlet for their movies—and serve as a counterweight to Apple's growing clout in the market for downloads. At its launch on July 15, the PlayStation Network offered both rentals and purchases from six of the seven largest movie studios. To many at Sony, the deal signaled increasing cooperation among the PlayStation team in Northern California, Schaaff's group, and Sony's film division. "Today there's much closer integration between hardware and software," says Peter Dille, the Sony executive responsible for the PlayStation Network. "The doors are more open, and people are finally realizing that their phones can connect to other offices."

The result of the growing spirit of cooperation? Sony in January partnered with retailer Amazon.com (AMZN) on an online music store, called MyPlay, that lets consumers download tracks from various record labels without copy restrictions. After years of criticizing the quality of Microsoft's programs for phones and handheld devices, Sony last fall astounded the industry by scrapping its own software and online store and embracing the software giant's Windows technology for its Walkman portable media players. Then in February, it chose the Windows Mobile operating system for a new line of phones called Xperia. And since July consumers have been able to bypass Sony's online store and download content for its e-book device, the Reader, from rival Web sites. Schaaff "knows how to speak the same language as both the entertainment and technology folks," says Sony Pictures Television President Steve Mosko. "And he knows what a 16-year-old wants as well."

Despite Schaaff's successes, there's still plenty of resistance to his efforts. Some colleagues praise him for his quiet thoughtfulness, but others say he has accomplished little in his three years at the company. "He came in lecturing everybody, saying 'Well, we did it this way and this way at Apple,'" says one executive in Sony's consumer electronics division. Others grouse that Schaaff has demonstrated little of Jobs' take-charge attitude. "To expect a storm-the-castle, everyone-pulls-in-the-same direction attitude, forget it," says another executive who has worked with Schaaff.

SERIOUS ABOUT CHANGE

Sensing the opposition to his new hire, Stringer has worked to shore up Schaaff's position. At a 2006 management meeting, Stringer asked young software engineers to sit in the front. That forced some senior executives to the back, sending the message that the CEO was serious about change. And in May 2007, Stringer put Schaaff in charge of the United Service Steering Committee, a group of 30 top executives that meets monthly to air grievances and come up with ideas to boost profits.

When veterans such as PlayStation chief Ken Kutaragi balked at sharing power, Stringer didn't budge. Kutaragi was moved into a new advisory role, and he eventually resigned. Since then, Stringer has tapped executives once based in the U.S.—whom he has worked with over the years—to head up key divisions: mobile phones, PlayStation, and the fledgling digital books unit, which sells the Sony Reader. While those new faces are more willing to work with Schaaff, "Tim [still] has to do things very gently," says longtime friend Ty Roberts, a former Apple executive who is now chief technology officer at Sony subsidiary Gracenote, which maintains a database of information about virtually every music CD ever made. "Sony is not like Apple. You can't just tell people to do something. It's all about building consensus here."

It's easy to see that Stringer and Schaaff, at least, have come to a consensus on Sony's future. Sitting side by side during a breakfast meeting at Tokyo's Westin Hotel in late September—Schaaff's first press interview—the two often complete each other's sentences. "There are a lot of people who were waiting for this...," Stringer says. "To fail," Schaaff and Stringer say in unison. "Exactly," adds Schaaff.

Sometimes roadblocks have even come up on Stringer's pet projects. Early in Schaaff's tenure, Stringer started trumpeting the Reader as proof that Sony could out-Apple Apple. Meeting with engineers at Sony's sprawling U.S. consumer electronics campus nestled in the canyons near San Diego, Schaaff discovered the e-book device was hung up by infighting among rival camps. The dispute confirmed the silo mentality he had detected in his first few weeks on the job. "I was hearing, 'Sony doesn't do this and Sony doesn't do that,'" says Schaaff. "I was a little suspicious."

One group wanted to make the gadget compatible with Mac computers, but designers balked at that idea. Sony had never bothered with Apple software, they said, and there was no reason to start now. And the online bookstore remained in such a muddle that even technically savvy users were having problems finding and purchasing the titles they wanted. The Reader launched in October 2006 to a lukewarm reception with those issues unresolved.

Although the Reader won points for design, the limelight has been stolen by the Kindle, a rival device released last year by Amazon. The Kindle has been widely derided for its blocky look and feel, but analysts say it has been selling far better than Sony's Reader. A key reason is that Amazon made it simpler to download content by including a free wireless connection to its online store, while the Reader must be attached to a PC to load new books. Sony on Oct. 2 released a third-generation Reader that still lacks wireless downloads. Steve Haber, president of the e-books division, concedes the company could be nimbler but says changes are under way. "We've got a lot of good things coming," he says.

You hear the same thing from executives across the company. But will the good things come soon enough to help Stringer meet his goal of transforming Sony by 2011? While Stringer and Schaaff say they'll get there, some former Sony executives wonder when Schaaff might help the company develop anything as iconic as the iPod or iPhone. "Apple is the Sony of the 21st century," says one. "In the past two years, Sony has had plenty of time to come up with an iPhone. Why hasn't it?"

Dell Bets Splashy Design Will Sell Its New Laptops

Dell Design Chief Ed Boyd is transforming those once-stodgy PCs with art and color. Can made-to-order laptops revitalize the computer maker?

Hanging on a wall at Dell's (DELL) consumer design lab in Austin, Tex., are neat rows of what look like abstract paintings. There's a splashy watercolor in turquoise, black, and green, and a mosaic pattern of white and red dots and geometric shapes. Another is covered with hand-drawn sketches of olives in green, purple, and orange. These aren't works of art, though. They're dozens of prototypes for future laptops. Look closely and you see the Dell logo on each one.

The man behind this effort is Ed Boyd, one of Dell's most unusual hires in recent years. Boyd is an industrial designer who used to dream up new sunglasses and shoes for Nike (NKE). Now the 43-year-old is trying to make design an integral part of Dell, the personal computer maker long known for cranking out boring gray boxes. "I was skeptical it could be cool," says Boyd, who joined the company last year. "I took the job when I heard the design lab would function like a startup for consumer [products]."

LET THE BUYER DESIGN

Dell plans to roll out the first three laptops with these colorful designs on Nov. 11, in time for the holiday season. Customers will pay an extra $75 for the designs, on top of the basic $699 price tag for the company's budget-line portables. The designs are from Nigerian painter Joseph Amédokpo, South African graphic artist Siobhan Gunning, and Canadian designer Bruce Mau.

For Boyd, this is just a start, though. Next year, Dell will let buyers customize laptops in a dizzying number of ways, mixing scores of colors, patterns, and textures. The options will go far beyond the handful of choices available from most of its rivals. In essence, Boyd is taking the Nike approach of letting people design their own sneakers, and trying to apply it to the world of computers. "We're pushing the idea of [made-to-order computers] to the next level," says Boyd.

Dell could certainly use a change in fortune. The once-mighty PC maker has stumbled in recent years: Its stock is off by more than 60% since 2005. Even after founder Michael S. Dell returned as chief executive in 2007, the company continued to lose ground to Apple (AAPL) and the resurgent Hewlett-Packard (HPQ). "We had higher expectations for Dell's turnaround by now," says Clay Sumner, senior analyst at FBR Research (FBR). Dell's market capitalization is now $24 billion, compared with $93 billion for Apple and HP's $87 billion. The net cash on Apple's balance sheet is about the same as Dell's market cap.

Michael Dell contends that the company is making progress. He says Boyd's efforts have helped Dell get back on track, particularly with consumers. "We've got the most exciting new products ever from Dell coming in the second half of this year," Dell said during a speech in June. "That's fundamentally what brings new customers in."

RISKS AND REWARDS

Still, Dell's timing is awful. With the economy headed into recession and consumers cutting back, it will be difficult to charge any sort of premium for cool design. Analysts say that's especially true for companies such as Dell that don't have an established reputation for design. "Price will be more important for consumers because of the economic deterioration," says Mika Kitagawa, an analyst with the market research firm Gartner (IT).

Boyd is used to taking risks. Last year he hired an obscure graffiti artist named Mike Ming to create images for Dell products, a move that worried some of Dell's straitlaced staff. He also signed off on an undersized keyboard for Dell's first mini-notebook PC, a decision the company's founder clearly disagreed with. "Michael Dell wanted the full keyboard experience," says John Thode, Dell's vice-president for small consumer devices.

Then the sales figures for these products started coming in. A limited edition laptop designed by Ming and the mini-notebook, released in recent months, both exceeded expectations, company executives say. "I got an e-mail from Michael saying: 'Keep going, going, going,'" Boyd says.

Boyd's design staff has now grown to 120 people scattered from Austin to Miami to Singapore. There are a dozen PhDs in the group, whose degrees include engineering, computer science, and cognitive psychology. Besides new products, they're working on such cost-saving packaging as an inflatable cushion made from recycled plastic. They're also trying to overhaul the online shopping experience at Dell.com by, among other things, moving to replace choppy point-and-click navigation with more fluid scrolling through images. "Design isn't just cosmetic," Boyd says.

Last year, Dell tried offering consumers the choice of a dozen different colors for their laptops, but the company couldn't deliver the computers as speedily as promised. The delays angered customers and sparked numerous critical blog postings and news reports. Boyd says Dell will be prepared this time as it tries to deliver an even more complicated mix of designs and colors.

Rivals will be tempting consumers with their own new designs. Apple has just unveiled a line of sleek laptops, made from a single piece of aluminum. The toughest competition may come from HP, which has been investing in design much longer than Dell and used that edge to surpass Dell as the world's No. 1 personal computer maker two years ago. This fall, HP is bringing out a touchscreen PC, the thinnest laptop on the market, and a $700 mini-notebook with a red-and-purple peony design from fashion designer Vivienne Tam.

These sorts of products may be a tough sell this holiday season. But if Boyd and Dell keep investing in design, they may ultimately find a more receptive audience. "People want gadgets that look cool on campus or in a café," says Gartner's Kitagawa. "Customization will be more and more important. In the long run, it's the way to go."

Advertisers Adjust to Market Luxury in a Recession

When marketing a Lexus, high-end appliance, or luxe cosmetic, advertisers are promising bargains to the cash-strapped rich

Nowadays, even affluent Americans are thinking twice before hitting the mall. A recent Gallup survey showed that 49% of people making $90,000 or more a year rated economic conditions as "poor," a 23-point increase since early September.

That has companies scrambling to tweak their marketing messages. Forget the usual talk of indulgent luxury. Instead, companies from General Electric (GE) to Lexus (TM) are employing sober, left-brain pitches—special deals, useful features, long-term savings. "There are plenty of high-end brands that sell themselves on the 'I-buy-it-because-I-can' idea," says Hayes Roth of brand consultant Landor. "They'll have to temper that."

Imagine trying to sell half an ounce of anti-aging eye cream for $145 a pop. That's the challenge facing La Prairie, the luxury Swiss skin-care company. Paul Wilmot, who handles public relations for La Prairie and other tony brands, has been pitching the editors of fashion and beauty magazines in the hopes of working the luxe potion into the gift guides that appear in December issues. His spin: The cream contains ingredients usually available only in pricey prescription ointments. "No one wants to look like an idiot who just bought something because it's expensive," says Wilmot. "So La Prairie makes an intellectual case."

Last month, GE began selling its new Profile washer-and-dryer set, which costs a very plush $3,500. The ads feature the stylish machines in eye-catching cherry red, an appeal to what GE marketer Paul Klein calls the style-conscious "iPhone (AAPL) consumer." But the ads focus more on down-to-earth practicality—specifically, technology that doles out the optimal amount of soap and water per load. "We know electricity costs are going up," says Klein. "And we know water scarcity is a problem." GE is also encouraging retailers to explain how the machines will save customers money by being gentle on their clothes, extending the life of their garments.

"TIME TO BE MORE RATIONAL"

For years, Toyota Motor's (TM) luxury brand has run pre-Christmas "December to Remember" commercials featuring a loving spouse giving his or her significant other a new Lexus wrapped in a big red bow. The company assumes there are still enough people out there with sufficient loot to put such pricey baubles under the tree, so you will see those ads this year, too. But Lexus is also hedging its bets. In mid- September it began running ads with the tagline "Lowest Cost of Ownership." That's a reference to Lexus' decent fuel economy, durability, and resale value. "It's definitely a time to be more rational," says Dave Nordstrom, Lexus' North American marketing chief.

A couple of years ago, discount brands got into the luxury game, too. Even Hyundai Motor, Korean king of the econo box, aspired to move upscale. Now the automaker is trying to sell entry-level luxury in the worst car-selling environment in memory.

Hyundai's response: Depict more snooty rivals as over-priced. In its ads, Hyundai is taking pains to note that its new Genesis sedan ($33,000) has the same sound system as a Rolls-Royce Phantom ($300,000-plus). "If you'd rather have money than a hood ornament," goes the ad, the Genesis may "look even better than a Rolls-Royce."

Generics Are Gaining on Name Brands

Recessionary forces are prompting shoppers to trade down from name brands, while off-brands are shedding their cheap-knockoff reputation

Whether they sell cookies or cough syrup, makers of generic products are profiting in perilous times. U.S. sales of private-label goods rose 10% in the year ending June 28, according to Nielsen, compared with a meager 4% gain for national brands.

Turning cheap in tough times isn't the surprise. What's different is that the rising quality of private labels may keep customers coming back. Products from manufacturers such as Perrigo (PRGO), TreeHouse Foods (THS), Home Diagnostics (HDIX), and Ralcorp Holdings (RAH) have evolved to name-brand quality and are starting to adopt similar strategies in marketing and innovation. "Today, store brands have a much more sophisticated offering," says Wendy Liebmann, CEO of New York marketing consultancy WSL Strategic Retail.

Several factors are behind this heyday for generics. In a homogeneous retail world, stores are looking to private-label offerings to distinguish themselves from rivals. Anyone can sell Cheerios, but Safeway's (SWY) O Organics line is so successful that it now licenses the name to other retailers such as France's Carrefour. With no ad costs, store brands also deliver higher profit margins.

Much of that money is being plowed back into the business. Home Diagnostics, which makes diabetics' blood glucose monitoring systems for retailers including CVS and Walgreens, invested $15 million to make its new product easier to use at a price that's roughly 35% below national brands. "We get pigeonholed as a private-label player," says CEO J. Richard Damron Jr., "but we spend a significant amount on R&D." Meanwhile, Perrigo, with $1.8 billion in annual sales of over-the-counter medications, just broke ground on a $25 million plant expansion in Allegan, Mich., and is acquiring companies abroad. "We're in a good spot now," says Perrigo CEO Joseph Papa.

The generics boom has also extended to TreeHouse and Ralcorp, which make private-label food such as salad dressings, soup, and hot cereal. "Not only are consumers trading down to lower-priced products, we believe that grocery retailers are stepping up their private-label focus to take advantage of that consumer migration," says SunTrust Robinson Humphrey (STI) analyst William Chappell. One sign that the balance of power may be shifting: Ralcorp recently paid $2.6 billion to buy Post cereal from Kraft Foods (KFT).